I'll get to why at the end of the article.Ī prototype design for the Tegethoff-class. Proposed gimmick: High accuracy, maybe a new consumable to temporarily reduce main & secondary gun dispersion. Lower caliber than average until higher tiers. Weaknesses: Historically lower than average displacement will mean less HP. Strengths: High accuracy (normal dispersion, high sigma). Think a lot of the traits of Viribus Unitis. This will be short and sweet - I won't get into detailed balancing or stats, just the gun calibers and a brief history on the ships and names.įor the concept: These will be optimum mid-range fighters. And there exists a long and detailed set of plans for Austro-Hungarian battleships that would sufficiently fill out an entire tree.įirst off, credit goes in large part TZoli - his research into this topic is phenomenal and I'll link his article at the bottom. While the Dual Monarchy met its demise following the conclusion of World War I, it is clear that this won't stop Wargaming, as evidenced by the new German Battlecruiser line that used WWI-era designs, even with imaginary refits. There is a clear solution for Pan-EU battleships: the designs of Austria-Hungary. How will the Pan-EU tree get a cruiser or BB line? What's Sweden's future? Will Pan-EU just become a catch-all for random premiums? Two of the biggest minor navies, Spain and the Netherlands, won't be providing historical ships or designs for the Pan-EU nation. With the announcement of a brand new nation entering the fray (welcome Spain) quickly following that of the Netherlands, many observers (myself included), are confused and wary of the direction the Pan-EU nation is going.
0 kommentar(er)
